Let’s talk religion… hard-hats on.

The Four Forbidden Topics

My mother used to tell us:

“Never discuss religion or politics in mixed company.”

Wise advice — for dinner parties.

But in the Transformation Experience, we can’t avoid them.

Religion.
Politics.
Money.
Sex.

Those four subjects hold enormous emotional charge. They shape identity, morality, power structures, guilt, ambition, shame, loyalty, tribe.

And because they carry so much energy, they quietly control people’s lives.

So here, in this sanctuary of thought, we talk about them.

Not to provoke.
Not to convert.
But to observe.

“But I Am a Christian…”

Occasionally I receive an email that begins:

“How does this apply if I am a Christian?”

Or Muslim. Or atheist. Or conservative. Or progressive.

My response is usually a question inspired by Alan Watts:

“How many other religions or philosophies have you studied deeply before deciding that this one is the truth?”

Silence typically follows.

Most people did not choose their worldview.

They inherited it.

Absorbed it.

Were indoctrinated into it before critical thinking faculties matured.

That’s not a moral failing.

It’s sociology.

But mistaking inheritance for independent choice is intellectual complacency.

Free thinking requires friction. Comparison. Exposure. Curiosity.

Wizardry — if we’re using that word playfully — requires observation.

And you cannot observe clearly if you are protecting an intractable belief.

Does It Matter?

Yes.

Beliefs determine rules.

Rules determine behavior.

Behavior determines outcomes.

If a belief system teaches inequality — I question it.

If it teaches that money itself is evil — I question it.

If it teaches that outsiders are wrong, inferior, or in need of forceful conversion — I question it.

And let’s be honest:

Name a religion, political ideology, or economic philosophy that does not attempt to shape behavior, thought, and action.

They all do.

That’s what belief systems are designed to do.

The Real Question

The deeper question is not:

“Is my belief system right?”

The better question is:

“Does my belief system allow me to think?”

Does it tolerate doubt?
Does it encourage inquiry?
Does it allow revision?
Does it welcome observation over obedience?

Because once belief becomes rigid, perception narrows.

And when perception narrows, energy contracts.

Money and Sex: The Quiet Controllers

Money and sex carry equal charge.

One governs survival and status.
The other governs intimacy and reproduction.

Both are wrapped in morality.
Both are weaponized culturally.
Both are used to control.

If you carry unconscious guilt around money, you will sabotage wealth.

If you carry shame around sex, you will distort intimacy.

If you carry rigid political identity, you will see enemies everywhere.

If you carry unquestioned religious certainty, you may stop observing reality altogether.

Transformation requires examining the lenses through which you see.

Not necessarily discarding them.

But recognizing them.

Can You Name One?

Can you name a belief system that actively encourages you to outgrow it?

That celebrates you questioning it?

That applauds you for thinking independently?

They exist — but they are rare.

And often misunderstood.

The Invitation

This is not an attack on faith.

Nor on politics.

Nor on tradition.

It is an invitation to observe your own mental architecture.

If a belief strengthens compassion, curiosity, equality, creativity, and courage — keep it.

If it restricts observation, diminishes others, or fills you with fear — examine it.

Transformation is not about abandoning belief.

It is about refusing to be imprisoned by it.

Observation first.

Identity second.

Always.

‍

Debate, British Style

In Britain, debate is practically a national sport.

It’s entirely normal to have a table-shaking discussion about religion, politics, and sex — sometimes all at once. (And in Britain those topics are not mutually exclusive; we’ve had enough Cardinals and Members of Parliament caught in compromising basements to prove that point.)

Voices rise.
Eyebrows arch.
Points are scored.

Then we pour another glass of wine and laugh.

No one storms out.
No one disowns anyone.
And almost no one changes their mind.

It’s theatre.
It’s sparring.
It’s cultural cardio.

I assumed the whole world worked like that.

Then I Moved to America

And discovered — somewhat painfully — that alternative viewpoints are often received as personal attacks.

In many circles, disagreement equals disrespect.

Religion, politics, sex, money — mention any one of them and polarization can happen almost instantly.

Not conversation.
Alignment check.

You’re either on my side or against me.

That was a cultural shock.

Why This Matters for Transformation

When you begin thinking independently — when you start questioning intractable beliefs — you will trigger reactions.

Not because you’re wrong.

But because identity is fragile.

For many people, beliefs are not ideas.

They are self.

Challenge the belief and it feels like you are challenging the person.

That’s why polarization happens so quickly.

It’s protective psychology.

The Free-Thinking Risk

If you decide to become a careful observer — to step outside inherited scripts — you must understand this:

Not everyone wants their script examined.

Some beliefs are welded to ego.

Some are fused with tribe.

Some are glued to fear.

When you question them, you are not merely introducing new data.

You are destabilizing identity.

That can provoke hostility.

The Art of Not Taking It Personally

The key, as a free-thinking “wizard” (if we keep using that playful term), is this:

Observe without attacking.
Question without mocking.
Disagree without dehumanizing.

And expect resistance.

Not because people are bad.

But because certainty feels safe.

Conversation vs. Conversion

In Britain, debate is often performance.

In more polarized environments, debate becomes existential.

The difference is emotional temperature.

Transformation requires you to lower the temperature inside yourself first.

If someone clings to a belief, you don’t need to pry it from their hands.

Your job is not conversion.

Your job is clarity.

The Real Freedom

The real freedom is not in winning arguments.

It is in being able to hear a conflicting view without feeling threatened.

And in expressing your own without hostility.

When you reach that point, belief loses its power to control you.

And that is a far greater victory than any table-shaking debate.

Even if you still enjoy the occasional glass of wine afterward.

‍

The Polite Silence Problem

Miss Manners — the long-running etiquette voice in the Chicago Tribune — advises that polite people do not bring up politics or religion at dinner.

Fair enough.

But if Americans avoided every topic she deems taboo — politics, money, sex, illness, what people are wearing — many dinner parties would dissolve into silent chewing.

What’s fascinating is this:

The topics that shape human life most profoundly
are the ones people are least willing to discuss.

Surveys show that large percentages of adults seldom or never talk about religion — even with their own families.

The very frameworks that govern morality, identity, eternity, purpose — rarely examined out loud.

That silence matters.

The Same Story, Told Differently

There are over 4,000 recognized religions in the world — faith groups, tribal traditions, spiritual movements.

And yet roughly three-quarters of humanity adheres to one of five major religions.

Despite the diversity, at their core the narratives are strikingly similar.

Creation.
Fall.
Flood.
Savior.
Sacrifice.
Renewal.

In the 19th century, archaeologists uncovered clay tablets in the ancient library of King Ashurbanipal in Nineveh. Written in Akkadian — older than Hebrew — they contained a creation story now called Enuma Elish.

Scholars sometimes call it the “Babylonian Genesis.”

Why?

Because it mirrors the biblical creation account.

And it predates it by thousands of years.

The flood story?
Present in Mesopotamia, Greece, India, Norse mythology, Mesoamerica, Native American lore, South American traditions.

The virgin birth motif?
The dying-and-rising savior?
The wise men?

Repeated across cultures.

Different names.

Same archetypes.

The nativity scene discovered in 5,000-year-old Saharan rock art — star in the east, newborn between parents and animals — predates Christianity by millennia.

This isn’t an attack on faith.

It’s an observation about pattern.

Archetype vs. Ownership

When the same myths echo across civilizations separated by geography and time, a few possibilities emerge:

• Shared historical memory.
• Shared psychological archetypes.
• Shared cosmic event.
• Or some combination of all three.

What becomes difficult to defend is the claim that any one modern interpretation holds exclusive ownership of the narrative.

Stories evolve.
They are edited.
Translated.
Politically shaped.
Institutionally protected.

Relaunched as “the one true version.”

History suggests otherwise.

Translation Is Not Transmission

Ancient languages — Akkadian, Sumerian, Sanskrit — carried symbolic density we struggle to imagine today.

Some esoteric traditions speak of Senzar — a primordial symbolic language in which thought, color, vibration, number, and geometry conveyed meaning beyond literal words.

Whether or not that tradition is historically verifiable is beside the point.

The principle is compelling:

Symbol precedes literalism.

Thought-form precedes dogma.

Meaning is layered.

Modern scholars — even brilliant ones — interpret fragments of fragments of translations of oral traditions of symbolic systems.

To assume perfect fidelity across millennia is optimistic.

At best.

Why This Matters for Transformation

This journey is not about disproving religion.

It is about preventing inherited interpretation from unconsciously dictating your life.

When ancient symbolic narratives are flattened into rigid rules:

• Women are treated unequally.
• Wealth is morally demonized.
• Outsiders are condemned.
• Curiosity is discouraged.

Then belief becomes limitation.

And limitation constrains energy.

The Wizard’s Responsibility

Observation requires flexibility.

If your worldview cannot withstand comparison, questioning, or historical scrutiny, it becomes fragile.

And fragile belief often becomes defensive.

Transformation demands:

• Curiosity over certainty.
• Observation over indoctrination.
• Personal responsibility over inherited script.

You are not required to abandon faith.

But you are required — if you seek growth — to examine it.

The Larger Perspective

Perhaps there was once a technologically advanced civilization that collapsed.

Perhaps archetypal memory survives in myth.

Perhaps the savior figure is a psychological template embedded in human consciousness.

Perhaps not.

The details are less important than this:

No fragmented, mistranslated, institutionally curated collection of texts should determine your entire operating system without your conscious consent.

You are allowed to question.

You are allowed to compare.

You are allowed to think.

Free Thinking Is Not Rebellion

It is maturity.

The point is not to replace one dogma with another.

The point is to move from unconscious belief to conscious awareness.

Whether you retain your faith, refine it, or reinterpret it is secondary.

What matters is that you choose it.

Not that it chose you before you could think.

And that you never allow fear of discussion to silence curiosity again.

‍

What About the Power of Prayer?

If ancient texts are layered, symbolic, and historically fluid…
what do we do with prayer?

Prayer is central to almost every religion.

It is intimate. Emotional. Powerful.

So let’s approach it carefully — not dismissively, not reverently — but observationally.

Intentions vs. Intercession

One of the key principles you’ve learned is this:

You can only set Intentions for yourself.

Not because you don’t love others.
Not because you don’t care.
But because you do not live inside their nervous system.

You barely understand your own soul’s curriculum.
What makes you think you understand someone else’s?

This challenges the traditional idea of intercessory prayer — praying for someone else to change, heal, succeed, or be saved.

The emotional impulse is beautiful.

The energetic mechanics are questionable.

What Does the Research Say?

Lynne McTaggart, who has explored the science of intention and consciousness, summarized numerous prayer studies in The Intention Experiment.

The results?

Mixed at best.

In some controlled studies, no measurable benefit was found.

In others, surprisingly, those who knew they were being prayed for had slightly worse outcomes — possibly due to performance anxiety (“Am I so sick they had to call in reinforcements?”).

One of the largest controlled trials was the 2006 STEP study (Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer), involving 1,802 heart surgery patients.

The findings:

• 52% complications in those prayed for (without knowing)
• 51% complications in those not prayed for
• 59% complications in those who knew they were being prayed for

No statistically significant benefit.

In fact, slight increased complications in those aware of the prayers.

Meta-analyses of distant healing studies show inconsistent results — some positive, many neutral, some negative. Researchers consistently conclude that findings are inconclusive and difficult to interpret.

Studying prayer scientifically is complicated.

Variables are messy.
Belief differs.
Expectations influence physiology.

But what is clear is this:

There is no strong, reproducible evidence that praying for someone remotely changes physical outcomes in a predictable way.

But Remote Healing?

Interestingly, some research into focused intention practices — when structured carefully — shows more consistent correlations than traditional petitionary prayer.

The distinction matters.

Prayer often implies asking an external force to intervene.

Intention implies aligning one’s own state and behavior with a desired outcome.

One is supplication.

The other is participation.

So Is Prayer Useless?

Not at all.

But perhaps we’ve misunderstood what it does.

Prayer changes the one who prays.

It regulates emotion.
Reduces anxiety.
Increases hope.
Creates focus.
Shifts physiology.

Those internal changes can absolutely influence behavior, immune function, and decision-making.

But that’s different from magically overriding someone else’s path.

The Energetic Problem

If you pray from fear —

“Please don’t let them die.”
“Please fix this disaster.”
“Please remove this pain.”

You are often reinforcing the mental image of the very outcome you fear.

Energy follows image.

If instead you hold a quiet vision of strength, peace, resilience — without attachment — you are closer to Intention.

But even then, you cannot override another’s journey.

A Subtle Shift

Instead of:

“God, change them.”

Try:

“May I respond to this with clarity and love.”

Instead of:

“Fix this situation.”

Try:

“Help me see how to act wisely within it.”

Now the power is local.

Aligned.

Responsible.

The Wizard’s Approach

You are not forbidden from prayer.

You are invited to refine it.

Move from:

• Asking for intervention
  to
• Aligning your own state.

Move from:

• Controlling outcomes
  to
• Strengthening your capacity.

When you pray for yourself — clarity, courage, discipline — you are essentially setting an Intention.

And that is measurable.

Because you are the system being influenced.

The Bottom Line

There is little reliable evidence that intercessory prayer overrides physical reality at a distance.

There is substantial evidence that focused intention and emotional regulation change the one practicing it.

That is enough.

You cannot control the universe.

But you can calibrate yourself.

And often, that is where the real change begins.

‍

‍

So What Do We Do?

If everything is energy — thought, emotion, attention — then we must be careful how we “send” it.

Firing prayers at someone like energetic bullets is unlikely to produce harmony.

When two waves collide, interference happens.

Only if they are perfectly in phase does amplification occur.

Human brains are wildly complex, layered with memory, fear, conditioning, biology. The likelihood that two minds are operating in exact energetic phase at the same moment is… slim.

Which means:

Trying to override someone else’s system with your intention is inefficient at best.

Disruptive at worst.

A Cleaner Way to Offer Energy

There is, however, a gentler approach.

Instead of directing force at someone, you can imagine generating a field of calm, coherent energy — unattached, non-demanding, expectation-free.

Some traditions visualize this as a peaceful blue light.

You imagine it forming in your own field — steady, warm, coherent.

Then you allow it to drift toward the other person like a floating sphere.

No hooks.
No demands.
No “this must fix you.”

Just an offering.

Whether they receive it, ignore it, or transform it is entirely their prerogative.

You are not imposing.

You are offering.

Energetically, that is far cleaner.

Money and Religion: The Twin Taboos

If religion is difficult to discuss, money may be even more so.

Surveys show that around 70% of Americans consider it rude to talk about money.

People will discuss:

• Sex.
• Affairs.
• Illness.
• Politics.

But not salary.

Not rent.

Not debt.

University College London found people are far more comfortable discussing sexual history than income.

Wells Fargo reported that Americans rank personal finance as harder to discuss than death, politics, or religion.

And yet money is consistently cited as a leading cause of stress and divorce.

Still, many couples never discuss financial philosophy before marriage.

We avoid the very topic that structures our daily survival.

Why This Matters for Transformation

Your beliefs about money are energetic programs.

If you were raised to believe:

• “Money is the root of all evil.”
• “Rich people are greedy.”
• “Wanting wealth is selfish.”
• “Spiritual people should not be wealthy.”

Then any Intention involving abundance will collide with guilt.

You will subconsciously sabotage.

You cannot consciously Intend prosperity while subconsciously condemning it.

That creates destructive interference inside you.

And internal interference is far more powerful than external interference.

Money Is Not Moral

Money is neutral.

It is a flow mechanism.

It is stored trust.

It is a symbol of exchanged value.

Like electricity, it can illuminate a hospital or power an electric chair.

The moral charge comes from the human using it.

If you believe wealth corrupts, you will resist acquiring it.

If you believe wealth amplifies character, you may pursue it responsibly.

Your relationship with money determines how comfortably you can set financial Intentions.

Healthy Money Energy

To use Intention effectively around money, you must:

• Be willing to discuss it without shame.
• Understand how it flows.
• Release guilt around earning it.
• Separate wealth from morality.

If money makes you uncomfortable, your nervous system will block expansion.

Transformation requires openness.

Not obsession.

Not greed.

But comfort.

The Deeper Pattern

Religion, politics, sex, money.

All four involve:

• Power.
• Identity.
• Control.
• Survival.

That is why they are charged.

And that is why they must be examined.

If you cannot look at your beliefs about money calmly, you cannot change your financial trajectory.

If you cannot examine your inherited religious ideas, you cannot expand intellectually.

If you cannot talk about sex without shame, intimacy will distort.

Energy trapped in taboo becomes stagnation.

Energy examined becomes choice.

The Invitation

You don’t have to abandon belief.

You don’t have to chase wealth.

You don’t have to debate doctrine.

But you do have to become conscious of the scripts running in the background.

Because Intention only works cleanly when the internal field is coherent.

If you are comfortable with money — not worshiping it, not fearing it — you remove interference.

And when interference drops, flow increases.

That applies to prayer.

That applies to wealth.

That applies to life.

‍

Money Is Energy

Money is energy in motion.

It is stored exchange.
Condensed trust.
Potential action.

How much flows through your life influences how you live — where you live, what choices you have, how much time you control.

But money itself is not moral.

It is a means of exchange.

Exchange it.

Circulate it.

Direct it.

Why So Many Fear It

In the West, discomfort around money often traces back to childhood conditioning — school, culture, and frequently religious teaching.

Certain interpretations of ancient texts have shaped collective guilt around wealth for centuries.

Kalinda Stevenson, Ph.D., a scholar of Hebrew and Aramaic, writes in Going Broke with Jesus about what she calls “Bad Bible” — interpretations stripped of historical and societal context and then weaponized to suppress ambition.

Texts that may have once inspired liberation become cautionary tales about success.

The “Rich Man” Problem

Take the famous line about a rich man being unable to enter the kingdom of heaven.

It has been used for generations to imply that wealth itself is spiritually dangerous.

But context matters.

If a historical figure called Jesus existed, he spoke Aramaic and lived in an agrarian system where the king owned the land.

Wealth was not entrepreneurial in the modern sense. It was political.

To be rich meant you had received land from the king — who was seen as God’s earthly representative.

That created a rigid social hierarchy.

The “rich man” in that story was not condemned for having money — but for refusing to participate in social transformation, for clinging to privilege instead of redistributing power.

The story was revolutionary.

It challenged entrenched power structures.

Over time, however, it was reframed into a warning about wealth itself.

That reframing served institutions far better than revolutions ever could.

“Money Is the Root of All Evil”

Another commonly misquoted line:

“Money is the root of all evil.”

That’s not what the text says.

The original phrase translates closer to:

“Avarice (greed) is the root of all evils.”

That changes everything.

Greed is destructive whether you are poor or rich.

Generosity is possible whether you are poor or rich.

The moral variable is not money.

It is motive.

When Verses Become Weapons

Isolated verses, stripped of context, often become rules.

Rules become tools.

Tools become weapons.

History is full of examples:

• Women may not lead.
• Husbands must rule.
• Slaves must submit.
• Certain groups are excluded.

These are not neutral interpretations.

They are power structures defended with selective citation.

The issue is not spirituality.

The issue is rigidity.

Ignorance Has No Power

As Dr. Stevenson points out:

“There is no power in ignorance of money.”

Yet many spiritual environments frame wealth as inherently suspect.

The result?

People sabotage abundance in the name of righteousness.

And then wonder why they feel stuck.

The Balanced View

Money amplifies character.

If you are generous, it increases your generosity.

If you are insecure, it increases your insecurity.

If you are greedy, it increases your greed.

The same can be said of power, influence, and visibility.

The energetic task is not to avoid money.

It is to examine your relationship with it.

Do you fear it?
Resent it?
Secretly crave it?
Publicly condemn it?

Contradictory energy creates interference.

Clean energy creates flow.

Transformation Requires Clarity

If you carry unconscious guilt about wealth, your Intention around abundance will stall.

If you believe success makes you spiritually inferior, you will remain small to remain “good.”

But there is nothing inherently virtuous about poverty.

And nothing inherently corrupt about prosperity.

The moral center lies in how you use energy.

The Invitation

You are allowed to:

• Earn well.
• Give generously.
• Build responsibly.
• Live comfortably.
• Enjoy success.

Without guilt.

Examine the inherited scripts.

Separate context from doctrine.

Separate greed from growth.

And build a relationship with money that is clean, conscious, and aligned.

Because money is simply energy.

And energy, when directed wisely, expands life.

‍

‍

‍

‍

Y

ContextChanges Everything

“You can find Bible verses that seem toproclaim these rules. But when these verses are put into their own contexts,the strident clarity of the Bible verses turns into something else. The versesbecome pieces of a larger whole. And very frequently, the Bible verse that isso confidently proclaimed as the very ‘word of God’ turns out to be adistortion of the original intention behind the Bible verse.”
— Kalinda Stevenson

That observation is not anti-faith.

It is pro-context.

Isolated sentences are powerful.
Extracted fragments feel absolute.
But meaning lives in context.

Remove context, and you can make almost anytext say almost anything.

Accident orAgenda?

Were misquotes and distortions accidental?

Perhaps.

Translation is complex.
Languages evolve.
Metaphors shift.
Cultural assumptions mutate.

But it is also true that translation hashistorically been controlled by institutions of power.

Kings.
Churches.
Empires.

When literacy was rare and manuscripts werehand-copied, interpretation was not democratized.

It was curated.

Adam Nicolson’s God’s Secretariesdocuments how even the King James Bible — often regarded as sacred andunalterable — was shaped by political, theological, and stylistic agendas ofits time.

Translation is never neutral.

Power andNarrative

Throughout history, scripture has been usedto:

• Legitimize     monarchies.
• Justify     war.
• Sanction     inequality.
• Suppress     dissent.
• Reinforce     hierarchy.

That doesn’t mean the underlying wisdom wascorrupt.

It means human systems are.

When text becomes authority and authoritybecomes centralized, interpretation becomes a tool.

And tools can be used to liberate or tocontrol.

The Problemof Complexity

Even beyond political influence, there isanother issue:

Ancient symbolic language may have operated onlevels we barely comprehend.

Metaphor layered within metaphor.
Numerical symbolism.
Oral cadence.
Initiatory meaning.

If esoteric traditions such as Senzar — or anysymbolic proto-language — carried multidimensional meaning through vibration,color, geometry, and thought-form, then modern literal translations inevitablyflatten the message.

Symbol becomes rule.

Poetry becomes policy.

Mystery becomes dogma.

And depth becomes doctrine.

TheUnconscious Interpreter

Every translator brings bias.

Every reader brings projection.

Every era imposes its anxieties onto ancienttext.

We interpret through the lens of our time.

That is unavoidable.

Which is precisely why humility is requiredwhen declaring, “The text clearly says…”

Does it?

Or does our cultural conditioning shape whatwe see?

Why ThisMatters for You

The purpose of raising these issues is not todismantle belief.

It is to free you from unconscious obedienceto inherited interpretation.

If a verse inspires compassion, growth,courage — wonderful.

If it suppresses ambition, induces guilt, orenforces inequality — examine it.

Transformation demands discernment.

Not rebellion.

Discernment.

The CorePrinciple

No text — however ancient — should replaceyour capacity to observe, reason, and grow.

If meaning evolves with consciousness, thenyour responsibility is to expand consciousness.

Not shrink to fit translation.

The deeper message of most spiritualtraditions is liberation.

When interpretation restricts that, somethinghas gone wrong along the way.

And you are allowed to notice.

Quietly. Thoughtfully. Without hostility.

Observation is not heresy.

It is maturity.

‍

‍